The Future of HR in 2026: What Smart Leaders Need to Know Now

Your organization might not be ready for HR's future challenges. Gartner research suggests 2025 will bring major disruptions that will impact workplaces deeply. Leaders understand AI's importance - 79% believe it's vital to remain competitive. Yet 60% of companies still don't have a clear vision or plan to implement it.

6/30/202518 min read

man walking through pathway
man walking through pathway

The Future of HR in 2026: What Smart Leaders Need to Know Now

Your organization might not be ready for HR's future challenges. Gartner research suggests 2025 will bring major disruptions that will impact workplaces deeply. Leaders understand AI's importance - 79% believe it's vital to remain competitive. Yet 60% of companies still don't have a clear vision or plan to implement it.

The future of human resources brings new challenges and possibilities as HR trends evolve faster. Three-quarters of knowledge workers already use AI in their daily tasks, though 78% do it without any official guidelines. Workers' expectations continue to evolve - 31% have quit their jobs because benefit packages weren't flexible enough. HR professionals and leaders must adapt to these changes quickly as we enter this new era.

This piece dives into key developments that will shape human resources through 2026 and beyond. You'll learn about practical ways to direct your organization through these changes. Smart leaders who understand everything from AI governance to building resilient workforces will succeed in tomorrow's workplace.

The acceleration of AI and automation in HR

AI's rapid advancement in HR departments isn't just theory anymore - it's reality. All the same, companies haven't adopted it evenly. A January 2024 survey by the Society for Human Resources Management revealed that only 25% of HR professionals use AI. Most of them started just last year [1]. This gap between what's available and what's actually being used shows both opportunities and challenges for HR's future.

How generative AI is changing HR workflows

Generative AI reshapes how HR teams work by automating routine tasks and boosting strategic capabilities. HR administrative jobs rank among the top 20 positions that AI applications affect most [1]. The technology works best with text generation and information summarization - skills that directly apply to many HR tasks.

GenAI helps teams write job descriptions, draft candidate messages, create performance reviews, and analyze thousands of employee survey comments to learn about meaningful patterns [1]. AI-powered chatbots now answer basic questions about benefits, vacation time, and company policies. This lets HR professionals tackle more important work [1].

Different roles see different effects. HR assistants spend 41% of their time on tasks that could be automated, while this number rises to 45% for payroll clerks [1]. Training and development specialists could see the biggest boost (68%) because their work needs abstract thinking and problem-solving [1]. HR managers face fewer changes since they spend 62% of their time interacting with people - something AI doesn't do well yet [1].

Risks of unregulated AI use in people management

AI brings benefits to HR, but using it without rules creates big risks that smart leaders need to address. AI systems can accidentally continue bias when they learn from old data that contains prejudice [2]. This might lead to unfair decisions in hiring, evaluations, and pay - possibly resulting in lawsuits [2].

The "black box" problem causes another major concern. Complex AI models often work without much transparency, making their decisions hard to understand [2]. This creates a basic trust issue: HR professionals who can't explain AI decisions lose credibility and might face compliance problems [2].

Privacy and data security pose equally serious challenges. PwC found that 85% of employees worry about their personal information's safety as AI becomes more common in HR [3]. Some problems have already happened - Samsung employees accidentally shared sensitive data through ChatGPT, which made the company ban its use completely [4].

Why HR must lead AI governance

These complex issues mean HR departments should take charge of creating AI rules. Only 20% of executives say HR currently owns their company's future work strategy [5], but HR teams know best how to implement AI ethically [3].

The CIPD states that HR should utilize its expertise in training, job design, workforce planning, and organizational change to guide companies through AI adoption [3]. Teams need clear guidelines for ethical use, data security, and fair treatment [3]. HR should create accountability systems with regular AI audits, ways to get feedback, and structures to watch for bias [3].

Good governance needs teamwork across departments like never before. HR teams should work with IT on technical details, connect with business units to understand their challenges, and speak for employees throughout the AI process [3]. Only 37% of HR leaders participate in top-level company discussions [3], but this involvement matters for responsible AI use.

HR departments need centers of excellence (COEs) for AI success. These centers should match AI with company goals, teach HR teams about AI's value and ethics, plan with HR leaders, and show real applications [5]. This approach helps AI create positive change instead of continuing old biases or making new problems.

From AI adoption to AI strategy: What leaders must prioritize

AI implementation needs a strategic vision to move beyond the basics. HR departments must develop complete strategies to guide AI tool usage as artificial intelligence transforms workplaces. Research indicates AI and automation could replace up to 30% of current worked hours by 2030 [6]. HR leaders need to take decisive action right now.

Building a responsible AI framework

Creating a robust AI governance framework should be the top priority for forward-thinking HR leaders. This framework needs to outline AI's role in complementing business functions and set clear guidelines for ethical use, data security, and fair treatment [1]. Organizations need to create an AI policy proactively. The policy should address transparency commitments and tell applicants how AI systems play a role in recruitment processes [1].

Good governance needs multiple approaches. Your organization should assess impact at two key stages: before buying systems to spot potential risks, and after purchase but before deployment to check actual risks of the new technology [1]. On top of that, it needs a complete risk management framework to handle user feedback and adapt to new challenges [1].

The AIHR AI Risk Framework provides a well-laid-out approach. It handles both external and internal risks while keeping AI use safe, secure, and sustainable [7]. The framework has four connected parts that focus on external risks, internal risks, data governance, and implementation levels [7]. This all-encompassing approach helps HR protect against bias, fairness concerns, and privacy violations that often come with uncontrolled AI use.

Training HR teams for AI fluency

Your workforce needs intentional upskilling to prepare for AI integration. AI literacy is becoming as important as digital literacy [8], but many HR professionals don't feel confident with these new tools. AI fluency works on a spectrum. Zapier's model shows four levels: Unacceptable (resistant to AI), Capable (using simple AI tools), Adoptive (integrating AI into daily workflows), and Transformative (strategically reimagining work through AI) [8].

HR leaders should invest in practical, hands-on training that connects theory with practice to build these skills [2]. Good programs give professionals the skills to apply AI concepts to real-life HR challenges right away [2]. Training should encourage a creative growth mindset that improves AI-driven work and creates room for experimentation [2].

Organizations should develop documentation and tutorials step by step to keep upskilling employees [1]. AI fluency needs the same treatment as other critical skills—it should be part of hiring, onboarding, training, and performance evaluations [8].

Aligning AI tools with business goals

AI implementations work best when they support broader organizational objectives. You should identify your organization's HR priorities before looking at specific tools. These could include improving recruitment efficiency, enhancing employee engagement, or streamlining compliance [4]. This clarity helps narrow down options and ensures technology serves strategy, not the other way around.

Strategic workforce planning (SWP) plays a vital role in the AI age. Companies can better anticipate workforce needs, respond to changing demands, and maintain long-term agility by making SWP part of core business operations [6]. A telecommunications company used this approach and found 12 top competencies needed for its 5G business strategy. They mapped these to ten critical roles needed over several years [6]. They moved from external recruitment to internal development after finding talent shortages for these positions [6].

Choose AI solutions that HR teams find intuitive and that work naturally with existing systems [9]. Transparency in AI operations remains crucial—pick platforms that explain data analysis and decision-making clearly [4]. Your organization should check how teams experience pilot implementations and ask if employees find the systems easy to use [1].

Success with AI in HR depends on measuring performance against strategic goals. Setting clear metrics early helps track whether AI adds real value or just creates unnecessary technological complexity.

The growing skills gap and the shift to skills-based hiring

The World Economic Forum predicts that half of all employees will need to learn new skills by 2025 due to technological advances [10]. Skills shortages have reached alarming levels across industries. McKinsey research shows 75% of employers now face major organizational skills gaps [10].

Why traditional hiring is no longer enough

Traditional hiring practices that focus on degrees and formal qualifications no longer meet the needs of employers and job seekers [11]. These methods create basic limitations. Research shows companies could have kept 77% of employees who left their jobs. Many employees cited lack of career growth as their main reason for leaving [3]. Companies now change their approach toward skills-based hiring to solve these challenges.

Research backs this method. Hiring based on skills proves five times better at predicting job performance than education-based hiring. It's also twice as effective as hiring based on work experience [3]. Workers without degrees stay in their jobs 34% longer than degree holders [3]. These numbers show why smart organizations look beyond old hiring methods.

Many qualified candidates with hands-on experience miss out due to strict degree requirements [10]. Job descriptions often create unnecessary barriers. More than half still ask for a four-year degree, yet two-thirds of working-age adults in the U.S. don't have one [12].

How to build a skills taxonomy

A skills taxonomy helps organizations hire based on skills. This hierarchical system organizes and classifies skills within a company [13]. Building this framework needs careful planning and teamwork across departments.

The process includes these key steps:

  1. Identify core skills needed for success within your organization, including technical skills, soft skills, and industry-specific knowledge [5]

  2. Group skills into categories like leadership, communication, technical proficiency, etc. [5]

  3. Define proficiency levels for each skill, typically using a three- or five-tier system [5]

  4. Map skills to roles to create dynamic links between positions and required capabilities [5]

  5. Review and update regularly as skills requirements evolve over time [13]

Companies should use existing taxonomies when possible. Beamery suggests, "The ideal approach to 'creating' a skills taxonomy is to use a pre-existing one—there are companies who specialize in this, and can deliver the strong data foundation and framework you need" [13].

Using AI to map and close skills gaps

AI changes how organizations find and fix skills gaps. Johnson & Johnson's leaders used "skills inference"—an AI process that analyzes employee data to measure skills proficiency and find areas needing improvement [14]. They followed three steps: creating a skills taxonomy of 41 specific "future-ready" skills, collecting skills evidence from multiple sources, and using AI to rate each technologist's proficiency on a 0-5 scale [14].

The company saw great results. Their professional development ecosystem usage grew 20% after the first skills inference round. About 90% of technologists used the learning platform [14]. Heat-map data gave executives useful information about workforce planning, showing strengths and weaknesses across locations and business lines [14].

AI-powered skills intelligence gives leaders a current view of their workforce's abilities [1]. Unlike old-style skills reports that quickly become outdated, AI provides live insights that help organizations:

  • Find urgent skill gaps before they hurt business performance [1]

  • Connect employees with training based on their current needs [1]

  • Monitor skill development across teams and business units [1]

This method addresses a pressing need: 38% of workers will need "fundamental retraining or replacement" within three years to fix workforce skills gaps [14]. Research shows that skills-based approaches can make talent pools almost 10 times larger, giving organizations that use these technologies a clear advantage in finding talent [12].

The rise of the antifragile workforce

HR leaders now build antifragile workforces that go beyond being resilient and adaptable to tackle future challenges. Companies that only survive disruptions will lag behind those that become stronger through tough times.

What antifragility means in the workplace

Antifragility brings a fundamental change to how we think about resilience. Nassim Nicholas Taleb created this term to describe systems that "gain from disorder" instead of just withstanding it. He explains, "Antifragility is beyond resilience or robustness. The resilient resists shocks and stays the same; the antifragile gets better" [15].

An antifragile organization helps its employees do more than bounce back from challenges—they grow and improve because of them. This key difference marks a crucial development in how we think about workforce development. Resilience helps people return to their original state after stress goes away. Antifragility makes people grow specifically because of stressors [7].

HR leaders can build antifragility by:

  • Creating a growth mindset that sees challenges as chances to develop

  • Supporting smart risk-taking and turning failures into learning moments

  • Building safe spaces where people can try new things and invent

  • Making adaptability a key skill at every level [16]

Recent workforce statistics highlight why antifragility matters now more than ever. Four in ten people feel burned out at work. Only 43% of workers believe their companies have made them better than when they started [17].

Creating learning cultures that thrive on disruption

A resilient learning culture sits at the core of workforce antifragility. Smart organizations weave learning into daily work rather than keeping it separate. Most leaders see this as crucial—98% of learning and development experts want to create a positive learning culture. Yet only 36% think they've succeeded [18].

HR leaders need fresh approaches to help employees grow. A good learning culture offers chances to learn while giving people room to develop. Employees should be able to chase interests that build practical skills in an environment where mistakes help them grow [19].

Strong learning cultures share common traits. They offer ongoing learning chances to everyone. They welcome questions and feedback. They reward teamwork and group learning. They help people work toward shared goals and use feedback to close gaps between today's reality and tomorrow's vision [18].

Companies with strong learning cultures perform better. Research shows businesses that use learning to change key behaviors see better growth, change management, productivity, and profits [18].

Scenario planning for future resilience

Building antifragile workforces needs careful planning for different futures. Scenario planning helps organizations predict various possibilities and create flexible workforce strategies [2].

This method looks at key factors that could shape workforce needs—like healthcare policy shifts, tech advances, and economic changes. Leaders then build different scenarios based on these factors [2]. Looking at multiple possible futures helps HR teams spot both workforce risks and chances to create new roles or upgrade skills.

Scenario planning does more than just prepare companies. It offers a clear way to make decisions that balance current workforce needs with long-term goals. It also helps companies invest resources more effectively toward likely future needs [2].

Companies with a broad view of their workforce can adapt quickly and use their people more effectively than competitors. Recent global disruptions showed that rigid organizations struggled while prepared ones could pivot when facing unexpected changes [8].

The best antifragile organizations never stop scenario planning. Instead of fixed projections, they create living plans that grow with new information. This keeps workforce strategies relevant and ready to handle change.

Workforce diversity redefined: Age, gender, and role evolution

Workforce demographics continue to change, and HR teams must adopt new approaches. Smart leaders need to prepare for changing age dynamics, gender equity initiatives, and role transformations that will reshape talent management strategies.

The silver workforce and post-retirement roles

Retirement has taken on a new meaning. The global population of people aged 60+ will nearly double between 2015 and 2050 [20]. This reality creates challenges and opportunities for HR leaders who plan ahead.

Numbers tell an interesting story about retirement patterns. Nearly 1.5 million retirees came back to work between 2021 and 2022 [21], and 96% said their former employers reached out to them [21]. Only 16% of employees plan to stop working at retirement age—a drop from 25% three years ago [20].

This "silver workforce" brings rich experience but needs tailored strategies. Remote work tops the list of preferences, with 53% of returning retirees looking for remote positions and 27% wanting hybrid arrangements [21]. The data also shows that 65% want full-time roles [21], which challenges old beliefs about older workers preferring shorter hours.

Bridge programs can aid smooth transitions from retirement to re-employment [21]. These programs offer training and networking while helping experienced professionals adapt to new workplace realities.

Women's equity and leadership in 2026

New regulations will put gender equality in leadership roles at the forefront. European directives will require companies to have 40% of their non-executive management from the "under-represented" gender by 2026 [4]. Management positions overall must reach 33% [4].

Companies must plan leadership development and succession carefully. Many organizations now use transparent board appointments and merit-based evaluation criteria [4]. Those who fail to prepare risk compliance issues and miss out on diverse leadership points of view.

The Women's Leadership and Empowerment Conference (WLEC2026) shows growing worldwide focus on this issue. Leaders gather to advance gender equality and encourage leadership development globally [9]. HR leaders should build reliable female leadership pipelines now to meet future needs.

The blue-collar and new-collar talent surge

Companies now find it harder to hire blue-collar workers than white-collar workers [22]. This shortage challenges traditional hiring methods and calls for new approaches to workforce planning.

"New-collar" jobs are growing faster alongside traditional trades. These roles blend blue-collar and white-collar work, valuing specific technical skills over degrees [23]. Software, technology, engineering, and healthcare jobs now focus more on specialized skills than formal education [24].

Hiring patterns reflect this change—59% of employers hired new-collar talent last year [24]. Three in five hiring managers plan to develop skills-based hiring strategies for their AI goals [24].

HR departments should look at job descriptions and remove unnecessary degree requirements that might exclude qualified candidates. Workers without degrees stay in their jobs 34% longer than those with degrees, which offers a clear retention benefit [derived from context but not directly cited].

Looking toward 2026 and beyond, successful HR strategies must rethink traditional age, gender, and job qualification boundaries. Companies that adapt to these demographic changes will gain key advantages in challenging talent markets.

The embedded HR function: Becoming part of the business core

Companies now realize traditional HR models don't meet modern business needs. The HR future demands a transformation from centralized support teams to business partners who deliver strategic results.

Why HR must move beyond support roles

HR teams need to evolve from back-office administrators to strategic drivers of business success. CEOs rank talent among their top three priorities, yet many doubt HR's ability to deliver results. HR must connect its initiatives with company goals to create real value and become crucial to organizational success.

Mattel achieved this change by hiring a new chief people officer to upgrade their capabilities. Amy Thompson created a leader-led model where managers work with HR partners to assess talent health and develop people strategy. "Especially in a creative industry like ours, talent is core and inseparable from our corporate and brand strategies, so we need our leaders to own both," Thompson explains.

How to embed HR into business units

The best way to embed HR involves placing practitioners directly in business functions they support. This model offers three key advantages: it helps business through strategic alignment, saves costs by targeting expertise, and encourages better organizational connections.

Square's HR executive Bryan Power got top executives to teach manager training modules. "When managers think of these people challenges as their own issues to resolve, rather than issues for HR to solve," says Power, "that ownership and accountability transforms the organization."

Equinox's People Services teams built frameworks for HR services and worked with general managers to implement them locally. This approach works because Equinox promotes general managers only from within, which ensures they know operational standards and HR practices well.

Training line managers for people leadership

Line managers must develop better people leadership skills as HR becomes embedded. Managers need to learn delegation, motivation, performance management, and giving feedback while building positive relationships.

A telecommunications company discovered manager training led to better confidence, communication, and delegation. These improvements created an open team environment where managers planned and implemented methods effectively.

Good training should cover management roles, personal style, delegation methods, goal setting, coaching techniques, and handling tough situations. Organizations that invest in manager skills will execute HR technology and strategic initiatives better as HR continues to evolve.

HR execution as a competitive advantage

HR strategy needs flawless execution to succeed. The modern business world rewards organizations that can execute HR initiatives well, yet many companies overlook this competitive edge.

Why strategy without execution fails

Poor execution wastes up to 40% of strategy value [25]. CEOs from 400 organizations rank strategy execution as one of their toughest challenges [6]. Smart strategies aren't the biggest problem - turning them into reality is. "Ideas are cheap, execution is everything" [6], as experts point out.

Many HR teams find it hard to balance big-picture thinking with day-to-day tasks. A mere 64% of HR professionals know how to line up HR priorities with strategy [25]. Brilliant HR strategies become useless documents without proper execution, and they fail to affect the business meaningfully.

Leveraging AI to free up tactical HR time

AI technology offers a solution to tackle execution challenges effectively. HR professionals currently spend too much time on admin work that AI could handle. Teams could cut 60-70% of routine task time with AI help [26]. Yet only 3% of companies use generative AI in their HR departments [26].

This gap creates an amazing chance for improvement. HR departments that use AI tools for admin work can focus more on strategic projects. As AI handles paperwork, HR teams can tackle important work like change management, developing leaders, and planning the workforce strategically [27].

Cross-functional collaboration for better outcomes

Great HR execution needs teams to work together across the company. The best HR departments team up with finance for budgets, IT for tech rollouts, and business units for talent planning [28].

Companies found that better communication between departments led to great results during tough times [29]. This all-encompassing approach will help solve workplace challenges, from hybrid work to business changes.

HR can turn theoretical strategies into real competitive advantages by encouraging positive communication and knowledge sharing between departments [30]. Teams that share information openly get better results.

Employee engagement 2.0: Moving beyond perks

Organizations have completely changed how they look at employee engagement. The numbers tell a sobering story - businesses lose £7.07 trillion each year (10% of global GDP) because workers aren't engaged [31]. These statistics show we need a fresh approach.

Why traditional engagement models are broken

The current situation looks grim. About 62% of employees don't feel engaged at work, while another 15% actively resist engagement [31]. We've moved away from expecting steadfast dedication and now focus on encouraging growth and experimentation. Of course, everyone loves perks, but they don't give top performers what they really want - chances to make a difference and help their departments succeed [12].

McKinsey's research paints a clear picture. People who find meaning in their work perform 33% better, show 75% more commitment to their organization, and are 49% more likely to stay [32]. Companies used to rely on yearly surveys and reviews, but these turned into "time sucks of meaningless paperwork" [12].

The role of managers in engagement

Managers make or break employee engagement. Gallup's research shows they influence 70% of team engagement variations [33]. Accenture's internal studies put this number even higher at 80% [34]. The impact shows - 57% of people have quit their jobs because of their managers [35].

Good managers set clear goals, give regular feedback, and care about their people. Today's employees rank having an empathetic manager as their second most important "must have," right after salary [36].

Designing meaningful work and feedback loops

Companies should show how work affects five areas: society, company, customers, team, and personal success [32]. This helps employees see why their daily tasks matter - especially important since 90% of workers feel disconnected from their jobs [37].

Live feedback systems are the life-blood of lasting engagement. These systems need four parts: gathering information about problems, analyzing feedback patterns, taking action based on what's learned, and telling people about the changes made [12]. When organizations create reliable feedback loops, employees feel valued and heard. This dramatically improves how well they keep their best talent.

Conclusion

HR faces radical changes as we look toward 2026. This piece shows how AI adoption, skills-based hiring, workforce antifragility, and HR's strategic role represent fundamental changes rather than passing fads. Organizations that accept these changes early will gain major competitive edges.

HR transformation needs both vision and perfect execution to work. Your company must build strong AI governance systems while training HR teams properly. Skills taxonomies combined with AI-powered tools help tackle talent gaps before they hurt business results.

Technical aspects aside, your workforce makeup needs equal focus. Silver workers, gender equity rules, and blue-collar worker shortages need fresh ways to find and grow talent. Leading organizations separate themselves by building resilient teams that excel during tough times.

Leaders know that HR excellence gives them a real edge over competitors. Placing HR professionals right inside business units turns them from support staff into key partners who drive success. Modern engagement strategies should emphasize meaningful work and constant feedback instead of shallow perks.

Success depends on taking bold steps now. Take a hard look at your HR capabilities against new trends. Pick your priority areas and map out how you'll implement changes. These shifts might look overwhelming, but companies that adapt now will excel in the ever-changing workplace of 2026 and beyond.

FAQs

Q1. How will AI impact HR roles by 2026? AI will significantly transform HR workflows, automating routine tasks and enhancing strategic capabilities. HR professionals will need to focus on AI governance, ethical implementation, and leveraging AI tools to free up time for high-value activities like change management and leadership development.

Q2. What is skills-based hiring and why is it important? Skills-based hiring focuses on a candidate's abilities rather than formal qualifications. It's becoming crucial as traditional hiring practices fail to meet evolving business needs. This approach is more predictive of job performance and can help address growing skills gaps across industries.

Q3. What does an antifragile workforce mean? An antifragile workforce goes beyond resilience, actively improving through challenges rather than just bouncing back. It involves fostering a growth mindset, encouraging calculated risk-taking, and creating a culture where employees thrive on disruption and continuous learning.

Q4. How is workforce diversity evolving? Workforce diversity is expanding to include age, with a growing "silver workforce" of post-retirement employees. Gender equity is becoming a regulatory focus, with new directives mandating increased representation in leadership roles. Additionally, there's a surge in demand for blue-collar and "new-collar" talent with specialized technical skills.

Q5. What does the future of employee engagement look like? Future employee engagement strategies will move beyond perks to focus on creating meaningful work experiences. This involves highlighting the impact of work across various levels, from personal to societal. Regular feedback loops and empathetic management will be crucial, as managers significantly influence engagement outcomes.

References

[1] - https://www.techwolf.ai/resources/blog/closing-the-skills-gap-a-playbook-for-reskilling-in-large-enterprises
[2] - https://www.skillsforhealth.org.uk/article/why-scenario-planning-is-crucial-for-any-nhs-workforce-plan/
[3] - https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/taking-a-skills-based-approach-to-building-the-future-workforce
[4] - http://womenfortech.eu/eu-adopts-directive-to-ensure-gender-equality-in-executive-positions/
[5] - https://365talents.com/en/resources/your-comprehensive-guide-to-skills-taxonomy/
[6] - https://www.aihr.com/leading-hr/execution-excellence-impact/
[7] - https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2022/07/13/three-levels-of-systemic-antifragility-building-through-workplace-coaching/
[8] - https://www.anaplan.com/blog/why-scenario-planning-is-essential-to-workforce-planning/
[9] - https://www.wleconference.org/about.html
[10] - https://impress.ai/blogs/skills-based-hiring-vs-traditional-hiring-the-modern-recruitment-playbook/
[11] - https://interapt.com/2024/05/30/why-traditional-hiring-practices-are-failing/
[12] - https://www.15five.com/blog/how-feedback-loops-increase-employee-retention/
[13] - https://beamery.com/resources/blogs/what-is-a-skills-taxonomy-and-how-do-i-create-one
[14] - https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-companies-can-use-ai-to-find-and-close-skills-gaps
[15] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifragility
[16] - https://tomorrowtodayglobal.com/2023/03/28/antifragility-in-the-workplace-a-guide-for-leaders/
[17] - https://trends.tuio.ro/trends/antifragile-workforce-development/
[18] - https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/creating-learning-cultures-1_tcm18-75606.pdf
[19] - https://corporatelearning.hms.harvard.edu/blog/creating-effective-learning-culture-how-make-knowledge-actionable
[20] - https://www.mercer.com/en-ae/insights/people-strategy/future-of-work/reimaging-work-and-retirement/
[21] - https://www.hrdconnect.com/2023/06/26/tapping-into-tenure-re-engaging-retirees-to-fill-skill-shortages/
[22] - https://www.adeccogroup.com/future-of-work/latest-insights/the-blue-collar-labor-shortage-and-redefining-the-new-normal-top-5-trends-from-the-world-of-work
[23] - https://www.modernhr.com/blog/2025/01/13/blue-collar-and-new-collar-jobs-are-thriving/
[24] - https://www.workhuman.com/blog/new-collar-jobs/
[25] - https://www.aihr.com/leading-hr/tactical-hr/
[26] - https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-organization-blog/four-ways-to-start-using-generative-ai-in-hr
[27] - https://www.teamsense.com/blog/ai-tools-hr-management
[28] - https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/reports/cross-functional-collaboration/
[29] - https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/effective-cross-functional-collaboration-report-2_tcm18-105009.pdf
[30] - https://hrmguide.io/strategy/hr-competitive-advantage/how-hr-creates-competitive-advantage/
[31] - https://www.aihr.com/blog/employee-engagement-model/
[32] - https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-organization-blog/making-work-meaningful-from-the-c-suite-to-the-frontline
[33] - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/future-employee-engagement-7-trends-watch-2025-danielle-farrell-ma-rntec
[34] - https://engageforsuccess.org/engaging-managers-zone/emz-part-2/
[35] - https://zensai.com/articles/managers-influence-on-employee-engagement/
[36] - https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidmorel/2023/02/21/want-better-employee-engagement-invest-in-your-line-managers/
[37] - https://www.hrdconnect.com/2025/03/18/the-science-of-meaningful-work-why-employees-seek-purpose-over-pay-and-what-hr-leaders-can-do-about-it/